At the time of development, the applicant will enter into a development agreement or provide assurances to ensure that infrastructure is available to the site. The applicant understands that if the annexation is approved that the City does not accept responsibility to extend and provide services. Finding: The applicant states that they are aware that the need to extend services to the site and that the extension of services will be the financial responsibility of the developer. Improvements for the needed infrastructure and urban services must be secured by a development agreement or other funding mechanism that places the primary economic burden on the annexed property and not on the city. Three key activities should be implemented to accomplish the protocol and are described in Box 102.Be made available in a timely manner means that improvements needed for an adequate level of urban services and infrastructures will be provided in a logical, economical, and efficient manner and are made available in accordance with the development agreement or other funding mechanism at the time of approval. Once an official release has taken place, then the disclaimer will be removed. Should the Technical Working Group require more time to organize the release of the analysis, preliminary results should be shared with national stakeholders and published on the IPC website, preferably within 21 days after completion of the analysis process using the following disclaimer: Preliminary findings pending official release at the country level.
Given the humanitarian imperative, the Technical Working Group should aim to, upon consensus, release analysis results that include final classifications, population estimates and key messages, in the shortest time possible. IPC communication products, including the IPC Analysis Report and maps, need to be shared with relevant stakeholders as soon as finalized, preferably within 15 days of analysis completion. Protocol 3.3: Strategically share communications products in a timely manner Protocol 2.2: Compare evidence against the IPC Acute Malnutrition Reference Table.Overview of IPC Acute Malnutrition Protocols.Part 2C: IPC Acute Malnutrition Protocols.Protocol 2.2: Compare evidence against the IPC Chronic Food Insecurity Reference Table.Overview of IPC Chronic Food Insecurity Protocols.Part 2B: IPC Chronic Food Insecurity Protocols.
IPC Classification in Areas with Limited or No Humanitarian Access – Special Additional Protocols.IPC Famine Classification – Special Additional Protocols.Protocol 4.2: Request and engage in an external quality review if necessary.
Protocol 4.1: Conduct a self-assessment of the analysis.Protocol 3.3: Strategically share communication products in a timely manner.Protocol 3.2: Adhere to mapping standards.Protocol 3.1: Produce the IPC Analysis Report.Protocol 2.6: Systematically document evidence and analysis, and make them available upon request.Protocol 2.5: Meet minimum evidence and analysis requirements.Protocol 2.4: Evaluate evidence reliability.Protocol 2.3: Adhere to analytical parameters.Protocol 2.2: Compare evidence against the IPC Acute Food Insecurity Reference Table.Protocol 2.1: Converge evidence using the IPC Analytical Framework.
#In a timely manner drivers#
0 kommentar(er)
